13:I[6874,["6874","static/chunks/6874-cd549e5073de1008.js","3063","static/chunks/3063-5e258979408a85a1.js","3820","static/chunks/3820-ddfe76d0b73b2737.js","6350","static/chunks/6350-eba8087dfe31258c.js","4055","static/chunks/app/tag/%5Bslug%5D/page-d8733ed1f50c74a5.js"],""] 14:I[6350,["6874","static/chunks/6874-cd549e5073de1008.js","3063","static/chunks/3063-5e258979408a85a1.js","3820","static/chunks/3820-ddfe76d0b73b2737.js","6350","static/chunks/6350-eba8087dfe31258c.js","4055","static/chunks/app/tag/%5Bslug%5D/page-d8733ed1f50c74a5.js"],"default"] 15:T697,

One wonders why the Mail & Guardian’s Chris Roper felt the need to save the skin of his own “reporters”, that of one Craig McKune, by repeating a journalistic fabrication?

In a piece of rhetoric without any substance, Roper repeats McKune’s allegation that Dr Iqbel Surve, the new head of Independent Media South Africa “accused the M&G of being funded by the CIA”.

Both Roper and McKune should know the difference between an allegation and a question mark, but then, since they are not exactly journalism school graduates, they may have missed courses on syntax and spelling.

In a rather candid interview, Surve called the shots, referring to McKune’s work, as absolute BS and challenging the media house to come clean about its ownership structure, which it subsequently did.

That an editor would take offense so easily speaks miles about the conceit of white South African journalists who believe they have the right to attack their opponents who do not have an equal right to a defense.

While I agree with the sentiment regarding the use of the problematic W. A. R word, (whose phoney war is this?) I most certainly do not accept either of journalism’s mother grundies, Roper nor McKune and their

Tag: McKune